Unified Field Theory Disproves Evolution

THE UNIFIED FIELD
THEORY

Third-Party
Conceptual Mirroring

Discoverer of the Unified Field Theory

Discoverer of the
Unified Field Theory

** **

**Dr. Bisconti has been
waiting for, at least, third-party conceptual mirroring (this is NOT another
and independent proof of the “Unified Field Theory”) before releasing any
portion of his formal paper **__Field
Unification: The Theory of Infinite Relativity__**. He has found that
conceptual mirroring at http://www.npl.washington.edu/AV/altvw80.html
in an article by Professor John G. Cramer on the CENPA (Center for Experimental
Nuclear Physics and Astrophysics) website of the University of Washington in
Seattle, Washington.**

** **

**What started Dr. Bisconti
on the road to his discovery of the “Unified Field Theory” was something he
heard a few years ago in a report from one of our national, nuclear physics
laboratories. The statement was clearly
and unmistakably made regarding quarks (a quark was once thought to be the
tiniest thing in existence) that (in the following statement, the word “larger”
does not mean “spatially larger”; it means “possessing greater mass-energy” and
the word “smaller” does not mean “spatially smaller”; it means “possessing
lesser mass-energy.”):**

** **

**Larger quarks have been discovered inside of smaller
quarks.**

** **

**(In the following
statement, the word “bigger” does not mean “spatially bigger”; it means
“possessing greater mass-energy.”) Like
the fictional, “Dr. Who” time machine called the TARDIS, quarks had been
discovered that were “bigger on the inside than they were on the outside.” Now there are only two ways to respond to
this: you either believe that you “must
be missing some important piece of information” and seek a resolution of the
contradiction or you must adopt the postulate that the “universe is
‘dis-integrated,’” (by “dis-integrated” we mean “not consisting of
dimensionally contiguous elements”; in other words, the universe is
multidimensional and, as we shall show, infinitely dimensional) which leads to
the postulate that “the universe is infinite on all scales,” which, as it turns
out, suddenly makes everything clear.
The following extract from Dr. Bisconti’s paper **__Field
Unification: The Theory of Infinite Relativity__** provides the core concepts of the theoretical physics that
prove the “cosmic disintegration” (“‘dis-integration’ of the universe”)
postulate and, in conjunction with other postulates, the “infinite scale”
postulate. It is these postulates upon
which the Unified Field Theory is based:**

** **

**(This extract begins on page 5112 of Dr.
Bisconti’s full paper.) The problem
with all “quark substructure” preon models is the “mass paradox.” (See Dr. Bisconti’s full paper for the
lambda variables involved here.) A
composite particle at rest may be either lighter or heavier than the sum of its
constituent “elements.” A nucleus
approximately 10 ^{-13} m in size is slightly lighter than the neutrons
and protons of which it is composed.
(Dr. Bisconti references hundreds of experiments in connection with the
preceding and following statements in this paragraph.) This is due to the strong-force binding
energy that holds the nucleus together.
About 8 MeV of energy are expended when a neutron or proton is pulled
loose from its nuclear binding. 10 MeV
of energy have been found to occur in multidimensional extrapolations. Thus, an assembled nucleus has about 1% less
mass-energy than its disassembled constituent “elements.”**

** **

**These facts are challenged by the competing
fact that the proton, approximately 10 ^{-15} m in size, is much heavier
than the mass sum of its three constituent “elements,” these being two “up
quarks” and one “down quark.” (See the “Quark
Hierarchy Matrix” in Dr. Bisconti’s full paper.) The proton's mass is 938 MeV, expressed in terms of energy
units. On the other hand, the “up
quark” has a mass of only about 4 MeV and the down quark has a mass of only
about 7 MeV. The kinetic energy (but
this is influenced by what Dr. Bisconti refers to as the “infinity constant”)
of the proton’s quark constituent “elements” provides the majority of the
proton's mass. The quarks in a proton
are confined to a "movie” segment (Dr. Bisconti has experimentally proven
that the three-dimensional universe exists only in our minds and our
perceptions) only approximately 10^{-15} m across.**

** **

**The product of uncertainties in position and
momentum must be greater than h-bar according to Heisenberg's uncertainty principle
(though Dr. Bisconti’s theory modifies Heisenberg’s principle by a factor of f(****l) [see Dr. Bisconti’s paper for the explanation of f(****l)]), so a quark occupying approximately 10 ^{-15} m must
have an energy-unit, momentum uncertainty of at least 197 MeV. The energy contributions from three quarks
(technically, there are multidimensional models that would allow up to 97.6
quarks [see Dr. Bisconti’s paper for an explanation of the “.6”]) having
approximately this momentum in each of the three space directions equals the
proton mass (+/- **

** **

**Scattering experiments, performed by Dr.
Bisconti (Dr. Bisconti has added computer-modelling to the mix) and others,
have demonstrated that quarks and leptons are locus subsets in terms of
distance scales of less than 10 ^{-18} m, approximately 1/1000^{th}
of the diameter of a proton or the “kezmeron” predicted by Dr. Bisconti’s
“Unified Field Theory.” The momentum
uncertainty of a preon confined to a movie segment of this size is about 200
GeV, which is 50,000 times greater than the rest mass of an “up quark” and
400,000 times greater than the rest mass of an electron. This also applies to the predicted
kezmeron. Thus, the preon model demands
the following paradox, the “mass paradox”:**

** **

*The
particles that make up quarks and electrons (and the predicted kezmerons) each
have many orders of magnitude greater mass-energy than the quarks and electrons
(and predicted kezmerons) that they compose.*

** **

**Note that these mass-energies arise from
their incredible momenta. (You can pick
this discussion up at page 5333 in Dr. Bisconti’s full paper.)**