SCIENTIFIC
BIBLICAL STUDIES – FULL CONTENT
SCIENTIFIC
BIBLICAL STUDIES – ORIGINAL CONTENT PLUS
THE L. F. NEXUS
SCIENTIFIC BIBLICAL
STUDIES – ADVANCED STUDIES – SHELF 1
“[The]…principles of the oracles of God [the Bible…the King James
Bible…the 1769 King James Bible…the Post-Oxford 1769 King James Bible…the Seventh
Copy Edit, Post-Oxford 1769 King James Bible]....” Hebrews 5:12
THE L. F. NEXUS HAS NEVER CHANGED ITS BIBLE VERSION
POSITION.
Bible Version Position: KJV NOW (KJVX)
Bible Version Sub-position:
KJV READER FINAL
AUTHORITY (KJVR)
We are also TSMX
ALSO.
See We Are For A New “Transdialection” Of The King James
Version Of The Bible
See BIBLE
VERSIONS - Frequently Asked Questions.
See The Authoritatively Correct Transdialection Of The King
James Bible.
HOW TO
ASK TEN BILLON QUESTIONS WITH A SINGLE QUESTION
Added July 29, 2005
HOW TO
ANSWER ONE BILLON QUESTIONS WITH A SINGLE ANSWER
Added July 29, 2005
YOU WILL NOW
BEGIN TO FIND CONCISE AND INCISIVE ANSWERS ON THE L. F. NEXUS BULLETIN BOARD
Added July 29, 2005
DOES THE BIBLE TEACH THAT AN INSPIRED TRANSLATION
HAS TO BE A WORD-FOR-WORD TRANSLATION?
Added July 28, 2005
DOES THE BIBLE TEACH THAT A TRANSLATED TEXT CAN BE
INSPIRED?
Added July 28, 2005
WHAT
IF WE WERE WRONG ABOUT THE KJV?
Added July 26, 2005
Added July 24, 2005
THE TRILLION PAGES ARE NOW AVAILABLE WITH PAID
SUBSCRIPTION
Added July 22, 2005
FIRST ON-LINE SAMPLE: JUDE
1:1-6
Added July 19, 2005
THE SCIENTIFIC
KJV BIBLE WITH CRITICAL APPARATUS OF THE ENGLISH LANGUGAGE
Added July 15, 2005
Added July 15, 2005
THE
KING JAMES BIBLE “10 DEGREES OF PRECISION”
Added July 14, 2005
A PEEK INSIDE
THE “TEXTUS RECEPTUS CSR9 – SN9X”
Replaced July 18, 2005
PEOPLE
WALK BY FAITH, NOT BY SCIENCE
Added July 12, 2005
FAITH IS NOT NECESSARY TO ESTABLISH THE “TRUE TEXT”
OF THE BIBLE
Added July 12, 2005
DOES THE ORIGINAL LANGUAGES BIBLE HAVE PRIORITY OVER
THE KING JAMES BIBLE? – Added July 11, 2005
IS THE OXFORD 1769 KING JAMES BIBLE AUTHORITATIVELY CORRECT?
Added July 10, 2005
GOD’S STANDARD OF PRECISION OF BIBLICAL TEXTUAL
CRITICISM AND BIBLE TRANSLATION – Added July 10, 2005
THE AUTHORITATIVELY CORRECT TRANSDIALECTION OF THE
KING JAMES BIBLE
THE 1769 TRANSDIALECTION OF THE KING JAMES BIBLE
Added July 8, 2005
BLOWING THE ALEXANDRIAN MANUSCRIPTS OUT OF THE
WATER!
SEMINAR ON THE “TRUE TEXT” – LESSON 9 – THE
ALEXANDRIAN EDIT PRINCIPLE
Added July 8, 2005
NOW
THAT THE KJV DEBATE IS OVER, WHAT’S NEXT?
Added July 7, 2005
IS THE
KING JAMES BIBLE INSPIRED?
Added July 6, 2005
PAST TRANSDIALECTIONS OF THE KING JAMES BIBLE
Added July 6, 2005
SHOULD
WE THROW OUT NESTLE-ALAND?
Added July 6, 2005
THE
UBD, THE UNIVERSAL
BIBLE DEADLINE
Defend
Your Bible, Defend The UBD, The Universal
Bible Deadline
Added July 4, 2005
THE SHORT VERSION OF THE
SEMINAR ON THE “TRUE TEXT”
Added July 4, 2005
WHY DOES THE L. F. NEXUS BELIEVE THE TRANSDIALECTED
KJV IS BETTER?
Added July 4, 2005
THE
BIBLE IS ITS OWN TEXTUAL CRITIC
AKA
“CRUSHING THE SERPENT’S HEAD OF TRADITIONAL BIBLICAL TEXTUAL CRITICISM”
Added July 3, 2005
Added July 3, 2005
THE L. F. NEXUS
PREPARES TO UNLOCK “THE TRILLION PAGES”
Added July 3, 2005
SR-OT3 SEMINAR PRICE SETTING – CAST YOUR VOTE!
THE FAILURE OF TRADITIONAL BIBLICAL TEXTUAL CRITICISM
Added July 1, 2005
DR. BISCONTI AND THE L. F. NEXUS DOWNPLAY TRADITIONAL
BIBLICAL TEXTUAL CRITICISM – Added July 1, 2005
THERE IS NO CRACK IN THE FOUNDATION OF OUR FAITH
Added June 30, 2005
ISN’T THERE SIMPLE PROOF OF WHICH BIBLE VERSION IS CORRECT?
THE HIEROSOLYMA MANUSCRIPT COLLECTION
WEBSITE
COPYRIGHT NOTICE
THE L. F.
NEXUSä
Copyright
2000 – 2005 The L. F. Nexus
(See our pages titled “Copyrights, Trademarks, & Patents” and
“General Legal Notice.”)