The Life Foundations Nexus
The Forty Years Projects
EVOLUTIONARY NIHILISM
The MOST ADVANCED Source In The World For Proof That The
Theory Of Evolution Has Devastated Mankind And Is Promoted Even Though
It Has Now Been Disproven
BUILDERS OF THE LARGEST
ANTIEVOLUTIONIST AND EVOLUTIONIST LIBRARY IN THE WORLD
Evolution
is dead. It’s just that everyone hasn’t
gotten the news yet.
We
have answered and catalogued 5,177,563 questions (see EON AntiEvolution Database).
All
of the answers prove that evolution is untrue.
Winner
Of 497,993 Debates Out Of 497,993 Debates!!!
Evolution
proposes the existence of intelligent forces…WHICH HAVE NO INTELLIGENCE!
FIRST,
be sure that your opponent is debating the subject of evolution for the right
reason.
The right reason for your
opponent to debate evolution is that they believe that they have proof that
belief in evolution is better than disbelief in evolution. This is important because, unless this is
true, the person you are considering debating is only a casual
evolutionist. A casual evolutionist
will eventually forget about evolution on their own or be unreachable by
the truth since they are prepared to call truth falsehood and falsehood
truth. On the other hand, the serious
evolutionist believes that they have proof that belief in evolution is better
than disbelief in evolution.
SECOND,
begin to use the expression “the idea of evolution” in place of the expression
“the theory of evolution.”
Evolution is nothing more than
an idea. It is not a theory. This is explained below. Your justification for use of the expression
“the idea of evolution” is that you know that there is no scientific basis for
evolution. Your opponent might not like
your choice of words but they cannot deny that your expression is correct. If your opponent insists that you use the
word “theory,” remind them that, while you will not, they are free to do
so. If they are still insistent, do
not proceed with the debate since they have proven themselves to be casual
evolutionists (see above).
Now, evolutionists do not have
enough scientific data to support the classification of evolution as a theory
or even a hypothesis. Webster’s says:
hypothesis, theory, law mean a formula derived by
inference from scientific data that explains a principle operating in nature. hypothesis implies insufficient evidence to provide more than a
tentative explanation <a hypothesis explaining the extinction of the
dinosaurs>. theory implies a greater range of
evidence and greater likelihood of truth <the theory of
evolution>. law implies a statement of order and
relation in nature that has been found to be invariable under the same
conditions <the law of gravitation>.
THIRD,
demand that either side can call a time-out at any time and that the time-out
can be of any duration.
There is no reason for an
evolutionist to refuse this requirement.
A time-out might be necessary since your opponent might come up with
information that you are unfamiliar with and are not, therefore, prepared to
refute. Also, it might take you some
time to get the material you need to refute your opponent.
FOURTH,
show the damage that the idea of evolution has done and allow your opponent
time to attempt to prove that the idea of evolution has done more good than
harm. Alternatively, your opponent
might attempt to show that evolution has done good. In that case, they must allow you time to prove that the idea of
evolution has done more harm than good.
If your opponent is able to
prove that evolution has done more good than harm, it is because they are
better prepared than you. At this
point, call a time-out, get the information you need to refute your opponent,
and then resume the debate.
FIFTH,
if a deadlock results or if your opponent is persuaded that the idea of
evolution has done more harm than good but still insists that evolution be
taught, end the debate.
If you reach a point where your
opponent is unpersuaded by facts that prove the theory of evolution has done
more harm than good, they have proven themselves irrational. End the debate. If they are persuaded that evolution has done more harm than good
but still insist that evolution should be taught, they have proven themselves
immoral. End the debate.
SIXTH,
if your opponent is persuaded that evolution has done more harm than good and
that, therefore, it should not be taught but still believes that evolution is
true, proceed with the debate.
More later as time permits.
The Oratio Ad Anti Evolutio,
the formal polemic against evolution, which utterly destroys the idea of
evolution and against which all evolutionists have been left speechless, is being
updated.