HOME PAGE

TOPICS PAGE

The Intelligent Person

The Life Foundations Nexus

 

 

GET READY FOR A BIG, FAT LIE!

THE EVIL OF DISPENSATIONAL AUTOMATISM

 

 

Copyright April 3, 2005 10:52 AM CST

By Dr. Michael J. Bisconti and The L. F. Nexus

Reviewed By Dr. Leonard Weinstein

Reviewed By The Pneumiatry Institute

Reviewed By The National Psychiatric Association

Reviewed By Chicago Christian University

 

 

 

 

 

 

WARNING!  WARNING!  WARNING!  WARNING!  WARNING!  WARNING!  WARNING!

 

We have completed our research on dispensational automatisms, which are supposed to be “automatisms sent by God,” and have established to an absolute certainty that dispensational automatisms are absolutely impossible.  In addition, we have uncovered some FALSE AND SATANIC ARGUMENTS THAT ARE ABLE TO PERSUADE MOST PEOPLE THAT THEY ARE POSSIBLE.  BE WARNED!  THESE ARGUMENTS ARE NOT TRUE!  IN ORDER TO MAKE OUR POINT, WE ARE PRESENTING OUR OWN VERSION OF THESE ARGUMENTS.  BE WARNED!  YOU WILL PROBABLY BE PERSUADED.  HOWEVER, DO NOT BELIEVE YOUR OWN MIND!!!  THE ARTICLE BELOW USES TRUTH TO PERSUADE PEOPLE OF A DEMONIC FALSEHOOD – THE IDEA THAT A PERSON CAN CEASE TO HAVE CONTROL OVER THEIR OWN WILL BY THE WILL OF GOD.  IN OTHER WORDS, THAT IT CAN BE GOD’S WILL FOR YOU TO NOT HAVE CONTROL OF YOUR OWN WILL.

 

THE BIBLE MAKES IT CLEAR THAT A PERSON ALWAYS HAS FREE AND COMPLETE CONTROL OF THEIR OWN WILL!!!

 

WARNING!  WARNING!  WARNING!  WARNING!  WARNING!  WARNING!  WARNING!

 

 

 

GET READY FOR A BIG, FAT LIE!!!

 

 

 

THE EGO DEMATERIALIZATION

 

OF

 

DISPENSATIONAL AUTOMATISM

 

 

Note to reader:  portions of the following article will be beyond the understanding of most people.  However, the other portions of this article will make clear what one really needs to know.  Don’t give up because you cannot understand a part of what you are reading.  In addition, though not really necessary, when you are finished reading this article, you can research those portions of this article that you do not understand.

 

The psychological mechanisms discussed in this article were discovered by Dr. Bisconti.  Research and experiments were performed at the Pneumiatry Institute.  These discoveries are based on research and experiments conducted over the past fifty years and completed on April 2, 2005.  All of the information in this article, in addition to being protected by the website copyright for the L. F. Nexus website and the web page copyright for this web page, is protected by the following copyrights:

 

 

The Ego Dematerialization of Dispensational Automatism

Copyright 2005 Dr. Michael J. Bisconti

 

The Ego Dematerialization of Dispensational Automatism

Copyright 2005 The Pneumiatry Institute

 

 

The term “dispensational automatism†” is used in the sense of “an automatism sent by God.”  There are effectively two types of dispensational automatism:

 

1.      GDA†:  Genuine Dispensational Automatism†

 

2.      CDA†:  Counterfeit Dispensational Automatism†

 

CDAs are imaginary (unreal, fantasy) dispensational automatisms.  They are not dispensational automatisms.  On the other hand, GDAs are dispensational automatisms.  Certain principles have emerged that everyone must take into consideration in dealing with GDAs and CDAs:

 

·        First, we cannot know a dispensational automatism is genuine (real) unless we treat it as a counterfeit dispensational automatism, which means resisting it with all the faith, energy, knowledge, intelligence, skill, and wisdom at our command.  This makes sense.  The reason this makes sense is that, otherwise, we would soon lose the “habit of resistance to sin,” one of our major defenses against sin.

 

·        Second, there is proof of “GDAship†”; that is, proof that a GDA is a GDA.  We now have the empirical data needed to substantiate and establish this proof and we can now provide a precise description of this proof.  This proof applies only to the past and present.  We can never prove that a future GDA will be a GDA.

 

The critical element in proving GDAship (proof that a GDA is a GDA) is the ego† (see “Technical Footnote 2” at the bottom of this page).  The ego is the conscious will.  The ego is NOT the self.  It is a PART of the self.  It is that part of the self that the average person would call their “will.”  It is that part of the self that one puts into action starting at the very beginning of every “effort to act.”

 

Now, it is the ego that can keep us from knowing that any kind of automatism is occurring.  The reason is that its very presence tells us, individually, that “you are acting” or, in retrospect, in reference to situations where we could not monitor whether our behavior was voluntary, that “you might have been acting.”  Logically, therefore, in order for us to know an automatism is occurring, the ego must be either absent or effectively absent.  Since the ego is always present, the only way we can know an automatism is occurring or has occurred is for the ego to be “effectively (virtually, in effect, as if) absent.”  The “effective absence” of the ego is accomplished through the automatic, psychological mechanism of “ego dematerialization†” (first identified by Dr. Bisconti).  Thus, (a part of) the proof that an automatism is a genuine dispensational automatism is “the effective absence of the ego that results from ego dematerialization.”  The average person might describe the experience of the dematerialization of the ego by saying:

 

I’VE LOST MY POWER TO ACT

 

or, possibly,

 

MY CONSCIOUS WILL HAS DISAPPEARED

 

NOTE THAT THE CONSCIOUS WILL HASN’T REALLY DISAPPEARED.  IT JUST APPEARS TO HAVE DISAPPEARED.  The result of the dematerialization of the ego is the inability to perceive (perceive with the mind or the senses) the ego (the conscious will).  It is AS IF the ego (the conscious will) has been amputated from one’s psyche (mind, heart, soul, spirit, “body,” [that is, one’s perception of one’s body], conscious awareness).  It is important to note that, in the case of genuine dispensational automatism, the inability to perceive the conscious will (the ego) is temporary.

 

The effective absence of the ego (the conscious will) means that we are, AT THE MOMENT (NOT THE NEXT MOMENT BUT THE PRESENT MOMENT), POSSIBLY unequipped to resist and overcome automatism.  This inability means the automatism is POSSIBLY a genuine dispensational automatism.

 

An automatism is DEFINITELY a genuine dispensational automatism when two things are true:  the ego is effectively absent and the automatism has a righteous “moral context.”  A moral context is the moral character of our lives immediately preceding and during an event.  If we were living a sinful life just prior to and/or during an automatism, the automatism might not be a genuine dispensational automatism.  It might be a counterfeit dispensational automatism and, in fact, it might be an “inauspicious automatism†.”  An inauspicious automatism is “an evil automatism.”  If we were living a righteous life just prior to an automatism and, if we were able to do so, fully attempted to live a righteous life during an automatism, the automatism would be a genuine dispensational automatism.  To summarize:

 

 

YOU KNOW THAT A GENUINE DISPENSATIONAL AUTOMATISM IS OCCURRING WHEN TWO THINGS ARE TRUE:

 

 

1.     THE EGO (THE CONSCIOUS WILL) IS ABSENT.

 

The absence is only a “perceived absence.”  In other words, the ego (the conscious will) is not really absent.  You, simply, cannot see or, in any other way, experience it.

 

2.      YOU HAVE A CLEAR CONSCIENCE.

 

Having a clear conscience means:  just prior to the automatism, you are living a righteous life and during the automatism, if you are able to do so, you are fully attempting to live a righteous life.  Living a righteous life includes doing EVERYTHING in your power to not be overcome by automatism and, if overcome by automatism, doing EVERYTHING in your power to overcome the automatism.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Technical Footnote 1:  The formal term for the “inability to perceive the conscious will (the ego)” is “self-imperceptibility†.”  The advent (coming into being) of self-imperceptibility is called “self-imperceptibilitization†.”

 

†Technical Footnote 2:  Dr. Bisconti is not a Freudian, though he acknowledges the validity of a number of Freudian concepts.  Dr. Bisconti is a Pneumiatric QuasiJungian.  Jung believed in God, Freud did not.  Dr. Bisconti coined all of the terminology in this article followed by a “†.