The L. F. Nexus

Einstein Fact Site

Home

 

 

 

 

 

Gays

(Update #46)

 

Here is the standard definition of homosexuality:

 

Erotic activity with another of the same sex

 

Regarding the science of the subject of homosexuality, note that scientific opinion is not science.  This is important to know because the literature of behavioral science (psychology, psychiatry, psychotherapy, psychoanalysis, etc.) may present scientific opinion rather than science.

 

Note that all behavioral scientists (psychologists, psychiatrists, psychotherapists, psychoanalysts, etc) are not in agreement about whether homosexuality is abnormal or normal.

 

There is no scientific proof that even a single person was ever born Gay.  For gainsayers out there, see the last paragraph on this page.  Note that, if it were true that one or more people were born Gay, this would simply mean that, like babies born with AIDS or like newborns discovered with cancer, these Gay people were born with an unfortunate malady that needed to be cured.

 

Visit The Gay Vendetta on our original website for more information.  A handful of the articles posted there may need to be updated with more current information and more current low-level conclusions but the high-level conclusions of all of the posted articles are still true and valid.

 

Note that the Christian faith has always included the belief that homosexuality is a sin.  In addition, a “strict constructionist” understanding of the Bible (understanding as the biblical authors intended) yields the doctrine that homosexuality is a sin.

 

Read the article at http://lfnexus.com/TheTrojanCouchSatinover.pdf.  That article may need to be updated but, in any event, the high-level conclusions are still true and valid.  Note the last paragraph from that article:

 

The mental health guilds in their many public pronouncements about “reparative therapy,” and the authors of the brief in their selective use of references and in their discussion of change exclusively in a therapeutic setting, appear to want nothing more than to draw the public and the Court into an esoteric debate between which group of psychotherapists is right.  But the reality is that since 1994 – for ten years – there has existed solid epidemiologic evidence, now extensively confirmed and reconfirmed, that the most common natural course for a young person [going through…period of sexual confusion] who develops a “homosexual identity” is for it to spontaneously disappear unless that process is discouraged or interfered with by extraneous factors.  We may now say with increasing confidence that those “extraneous” factors are primarily the “social milieu” in which the person finds himself.  Ironically, this “social milieu” is the family setting and culture being created by, inter alia, the decisions enforced by the Justices of the Supreme Court of the  United States acting in coordination with the misrepresentation of scientific evidence provided to it by the American Psychiatric Association, the American Psychological Association, and the National Association of Social Workers.

 

Note, in particular, these words from the above paragraph:

 

…the most common natural course for a young person [going through…period of sexual confusion] who develops a “homosexual identity” is for it to spontaneously disappear unless that process is discouraged or interfered with by extraneous factors.

 

This finding is consistent with the fears of many that people and, especially, young people…that people are being turned into homosexuals by other people.

 

Now, if nothing else, it is certain that no one knows whether the American Psychiatric Association can be trusted in any of its past, present, or future pronouncements on the subject of homosexuality.  This is because experts on both sides of the debate have opposed or defended the American Psychiatric Association in this regard.  The end result is that the American Psychiatric Association has long lost any position of leadership in the debate.  Note that, had the American Psychiatric Association put forth any scientific findings, they would have maintained a position of leadership in the debate.

 

Now, this is our 46th update of this web page and, still, not a single person has proffered one iota of scientific evidence supporting the idea that homosexuality is not insane.  (The next two sentences are satire.)  Please, someone, stand up!  We want to publish your evidence!

  

Now, in order to be fair and balanced, please email us at email@lfnexus.com if you disagree in any way with this article.  Include the code words “zebra zebra one” in the subject line if you want your email on the subject of Gays to be read by us.