Daily Archives: October 6, 2011

POSITIONAL IMPACT> We are n…

POSITIONAL IMPACT> We are now going to focus on the IMPACT of beliefs; that is, what are the CONSEQUENCES of believing what one believes!

Posted in Twitter | Leave a comment

NEW DIRECTION> We now begin…

NEW DIRECTION> We now begin to see that much time can be saved and more people persuaded by concentrating on POSITIONAL IMPACT. See next twt

Posted in Twitter | Leave a comment

.@annihilist Maybe so but you …

.@annihilist Maybe so but you must at least concede that my statement is TECHNICALLY true.

Posted in Twitter | Leave a comment

.@annihilist Though your state…

.@annihilist Though your statement is only technically true, we concede the point. Now, children MAY be REQUIRED (FORCIBLENESS) to read book

Posted in Twitter | Leave a comment

.@annihilist We thank you for …

.@annihilist We thank you for triggering thought leading to needed content additions and enhancements!

Posted in Twitter | Leave a comment

“POSITION STATEMENT SUMMARY” L…

“POSITION STATEMENT SUMMARY” LANGUAGE ENHANCEMENT> See http://t.co/NO0Wj3nk under “Brainwashers.”

Posted in Twitter | Leave a comment

TERMINOLOGY ADDITION> We wi…

TERMINOLOGY ADDITION> We will now also begin to talk about “counteroffensives” rather than “killing.”

Posted in Twitter | Leave a comment

.@annihilist As long as there …

.@annihilist As long as there is no FORCIBLENESS, there is no brainwashing.

Posted in Twitter | Leave a comment

ESSENTIAL DEFINITION OF BRAINW…

ESSENTIAL DEFINITION OF BRAINWASHING> “a FORCIBLE indoctrination to induce someone to…accept…[certain] ideas” – See http://t.co/ZBrwd2WF

Posted in Twitter | Leave a comment

TERMINOLOGY CHANGE> From th…

TERMINOLOGY CHANGE> From this point on, we will refer to “self-defense” rather than “killing.”

Posted in Twitter | Leave a comment

.@annihilist No sane person ob…

.@annihilist No sane person objects to killing per se (in itself). The objection is always about whether the killing is JUSTIFIED.

Posted in Twitter | Leave a comment

OUR VIEWS> <Q> Dr. Bi…

OUR VIEWS> <Q> Dr. Bisconti, how long do you stick to a viewpoint? <A> The more time goes by the less likely we are to change a viewpoint.

Posted in Twitter | Leave a comment

.@annihilist Essentially, ever…

.@annihilist Essentially, everyone will have to decide for themselves.

Posted in Twitter | Leave a comment

.@annihilist Hi. See http://t….

.@annihilist Hi. See http://t.co/NO0Wj3nk under “Brainwashers.”

Posted in Twitter | Leave a comment

NEW POSITION ON KILLING OF BRAINWASHERS

NEW POSITION ON KILLING OF BRAINWASHERS>> “POSITION STATEMENT SUMMARY” EXPANDED> See http://t.co/NO0Wj3nk.

Posted in Twitter | Leave a comment

NEW POSITION>> KILLING&g…

NEW POSITION>> KILLING> There cannot be a RULE about killing brainwashers. All we know is, AFTER exhausting all legal means, ok FOR US!

Posted in Twitter | Leave a comment

“GAY” VERSUS KILLER> <Q&…

“GAY” VERSUS KILLER> <Q> Dr B, Are you saying brainwashing to (x) “Gay” is worse than to (y) killer? <A> Big sin today, bigger sin tomorrow.

Posted in Twitter | Leave a comment

KILLING> <Q> Dr. Bisc…

KILLING> <Q> Dr. Bisconti, isn’t killing an ADULT worse than brainwashing of a CHILD? <A> Not if the child is brainwashed to be a KILLER!

Posted in Twitter | Leave a comment

KILLING> <Q> Dr. Bisc…

KILLING> <Q> Dr. Bisconti, is killing inherently (in itself [by itself]) evil and a sin? <A> No, e.g., if one MUST kill to protect a child.

Posted in Twitter | Leave a comment

2012 ELECTION> Elect a pers…

2012 ELECTION> Elect a person who has not proven that they should be impeached.

Posted in Twitter | Leave a comment