Daily Archives: September 22, 2011

<Q> DR. BISCONTI, SO YOU NOW BELIEVE IN EVOLUTION? <A> I BELIEVE IN WHEREVER FACT, LOGIC, AND GOD-GIVEN INSIGHT TAKE ME!

THE CREATIONISTIC LOOPHOLE> There is an UNORTHODOX interpretation of Genesis 6 that talks about A SECOND LINE OF HUMANOIDS CALLED “NEPHILIM”

ORIGINAL DIALECTICALISM> The word “ORGINAL” reflects ORIGINS. The word “DIALECTICALISM” reflects the achievement of RESOLUTION.

ORIGINAL DIALECTICALISM> We are retaining the term “SUPER CREATIONISM” as a secondary, subordinate, “aka” name.

Now REALLY on the road.

.@sapient_ape Well, I guess that shows how much of a nonsexist I am. LOL! @PerturbSecular

.@sapient_ape LOL!

.@sapient_ape PS: I guess because of your boldness, I thought I was talking with a man. Don’t worry, I won’t start going easy on you.

.@sapient_ape My formal credentials summary is found in a number of places. The best is at http://t.co/bCkJ7z5h. @PerturbSecular

.@sapient_ape Forgive me for this: I was studying science when you were but a twinkle in the twinkle of someone’s eye. @PerturbSecular

On the road.

CRITICS> PLEASE GIVE US THE BENEFIT OF THE DOUBT UNTIL WE ACTUALLY PROVE OURSELVES IDIOTS!

.@sapient_ape We welcome all scientific commentary. @PerturbSecular

WHY WE PUT QUOTATION MARKS AROUND WORD “EVOLUTION”> The formal term is “abcreationism” but we can’t keep explaining abcreationism. See next.

.@sapient_ape See http://t.co/27Tf8o9N. @PerturbSecular

.@PerturbSecular Complex numbers have a practical use in aerodynamics in wing design, for one thing. PS: No Ph.D. in physics. @sapient_ape

.@annihilist Much better but still needs to be stronger. Again, I’ll see what I can do.

.@sapient_ape (@PerturbSecular) Just a miscommunication.

.@annihilist Hi. You need a stronger argument. I’ll see what I can do.

.@pjdelcampo2attn See http://t.co/27Tf8o9N.