Daily Archives: September 4, 2011

Evolution> The Bible and a sequence of adaptations can both be true.

Evolutionists> Evolutionists act like the totality of human experience is made up of atoms. What atoms are IDEAS made of? Iron? Calcium?

10 Million Tweets> If all of my writings on my website alone were converted to tweets, they would add up to over 10 million tweets.

Evolution> Someone was making fun of us for using the word “monkeys” in quotation marks. Someone needs an English grammar refresher course.

Provocative Rhetoric Cessation Date> Provocative rhetoric was stopped on September 4, 2011 because of our adoption of the Golden Loophole.

The Golden Loophole> You will find a clear statement of the Golden Loophole at http://t.co/CQ2dJqt.

Historical Record> We will not be purging past provocative rhetoric because we always retain an historical record of our previous worldview.

Provocative Rhetoric> The Golden Loophole puts an end to provocative rhetoric before audiences. No more calling anyone a moron in public.

The Golden Loophole> The golden loophole does not mean that one ceases to oppose delusions.

The “Golden Loophole”> The “golden loophole” is that those we oppose may benefit from their delusions and, therefore, we must be cool.

The “Golden Loophole”> We’ve finally found the “golden loophole” that will allow us to speak unemotionally about those we oppose.

Delusion> Not all delusion is bad; for example, the delusion of the Nazi that you aren’t hiding someone of Jewish descent.

Evolutionists> If there are any sincere, honest, decent evolutionists, we must conclude that their delusion is from God for their good.

Evolution> You have to give Devil his due; evolutionists may have a lot of FACTS. However, evolution is a CREDULOUS CONCLUSION, not a FACT.

Evolution> If we agreed with evolutionists on 99.999999% of what they have to say, that would not prove that evolution was true.

Evolution> Being a genius does not prove infallibility. This is not to say that any evolutionist is a genius but one or more might be.

Evolution> Evolutionary scientists present facts but, then, THEY DEMAND THAT YOU TRUST THEM FOR THE CORRECT INTERPRETATION OF THOSE FACTS.

Evolution> The belief in evolution is NOT based on observation of anything. It IS based on faith in one or more other people.

Evolution> A SCIENTIFIC proof requires a COMPLETE TEST SAMPLE. Evolutionists CAN NEVER ACQUIRE A COMPLETE TEST SAMPLE!

Evolutionists> There are some undereducated evolutionists that think that the idea of a sequence of adaptations IS the idea of evolution.